
Latest Real Estate news and tips on this ever changing Real Estate Marketing. Specializing Residential properties, foreclosures, short sales and relocations throughout Greater Sacramento area.
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
New Housing Scam Emerges; California Homeowners Beware.

12:56 p.m., March 7, 2012
Monday, August 1, 2011
Valencia has been trying to short sell his Central Fresno home since August of 2009.
"At the time there was a lot of things that changed in our lives that we couldn't afford our home anymore," said Valencia.
Instead of going into foreclosure - he chose another alternative. A short sale -- where homeowners with a proven hardship negotiate an agreement with their lender to sell their home for less than what they owe. But so far - he's run into a number of man-made roadblocks.
Valencia said, "The most difficult part is the lack of communication."
Don Faught, California Association of Realtors said, "Californian's are being victimized by a process that should be helping them."
At a news conference outside Valencia's home - a group of Central Valley realtors said he's not alone - calling the short sale process "broken."
Fresno Realtor, Patrick Prince said, "The vast majority of properties we put through into contract, the buyer cancels and moves on to another property before we can get a short sale."
They say the problem is with the lenders slow response times, repeated requests for documentation and poor communication with their clients. Some realtors even said the lender foreclosed on the home before the short sale was completed.
Prince said, "I think the process is similar enough among all the lenders that it could be streamlined across the board."
They're now calling for reform. Demanding the lender appoint a single point of contact for each transaction -- speed up the approval process -- and stop foreclosure proceedings while negotiating a short sale. Solutions they believe will help thousands of homeowners who face foreclosure each year.
Valencia said, "I'd hate for someone to go through this. That's the only reason I'm here."
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
California pending home sales rise in June, distressed properties remain flat C.A.R. reports
July 20, 2011
California pending home sales rise in June, distressed properties remain flat C.A.R. reports
LOS ANGELES (July 20) – California pending home sales rose for the second consecutive month in June, while the share of distressed property sales was unchanged, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) reported today.
Pending home sales:
Pending home sales in California rose in June, according to C.A.R.’s Pending Home Sales Index (PHSI)*. The index was 119.0 in June, an increase of 1.9 percent from May’s revised index of 116.8, based on contracts signed in June. The index also was up 4.4 percent from June 2010. Pending home sales are forward-looking indicators of future home sales activity, providing information on the future direction of the market.
“Pending home sales have improved in the last couple of months and the next few months should bring continued gains,” said C.A.R. President Beth L. Peerce. “So much depends on the direction of the economy going forward. As for the makeup of the market, distressed sales continue to be a significant part of the market with the split between short sales and REO sales varying greatly across the state.”
Distressed housing market data:
- The total share of all distressed property types sold statewide was unchanged in June from May’s revised 47 percent. The share also was unchanged from a year prior.
- Of the distressed properties sold statewide, 19 percent were short sales, a decline from last month’s share of 20 percent and last year’s share of 21 percent.
- At 27 percent, the share of REO (real estate-owned) sales was unchanged compared with May, but was up from 25 percent reported in June 2010.
- Non-distressed sales made up the remaining share of home sales in June at 53 percent, unchanged from both previous month and year.
- View a video of C.A.R. Chief Economist Leslie Appleton-Young discussing highlights of the June existing home sales and price report, which was released July 14.
- View a chart of pending sales compared with closed sales.
# # #
(Single-family)
Type of Sale | June-10 | May-11 | June-11 |
REOs | 25% | 27% | 27% |
Short Sales | 21% | 20% | 19% |
Total Distressed Sales | 47% | 47% | 47% |
Single-family Distressed Home Sales by Select Counties
(Percent of total sales)
County | June-10 | May-11 | June-11 |
Amador | 44% | 61% | 51% |
Butte | 27% | 44% | 34% |
Humboldt | 20% | 17% | 29% |
Kern | 68% | 66% | 66% |
Lake | 62% | 80% | 86% |
Los Angeles | 47% | 45% | 47% |
Madera | 54% | 85% | 83% |
Marin | 20% | 28% | 26% |
Mendocino | 32% | 51% | 63% |
Merced | 53% | 59% | 64% |
Napa | 49% | 43% | 51% |
Orange | 33% | 36% | 35% |
Riverside | 69% | 65% | 61% |
Sacramento | 62% | 65% | 65% |
San Bernardino | 69% | 69% | 69% |
San Diego | 25% | 29% | 28% |
San Luis Obispo | 40% | 40% | 42% |
Solano | 66% | 71% | 72% |
Sonoma | 43% | 48% | 51% |
Tehama | 67% | 62% | 73% |
CALIFORNIA | 47% | 47% | 47% |
*Note: C.A.R.’s pending sales information is generated from a survey of more than 70 associations of REALTORS® and MLSs throughout the state. Pending home sales are forward-looking indicators of future home sales activity, offering solid information on future changes in the direction of the market. A sale is listed as pending after a seller has accepted a sales contract on a property. The majority of pending home sales usually becomes closed sales transactions one to two months later. The year 2008 was used as the benchmark for the Pending Homes Sales Index. An index of 100 is equal to the average level of contract activity during 2008.
Leading the way...® in California real estate for more than 100 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States, with more than 160,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
No More State Tax on Forgiven Dept in California

NO MORE STATE TAX ON FORGIVEN DEBT
Distressed homeowners no longer have to pay California state income tax on debt forgiven in a short sale, foreclosure, or loan modification. Enacted into law yesterday, Senate Bill 401 generally aligns California's tax treatment of mortgage debt relief income with federal law. For debt forgiven on a loan secured by a "qualified principal residence," borrowers will now be exempt from both federal and state income tax consequences. The existing federal exemption is for indebtedness up to $2 million, whereas the new California exemption is for indebtedness up to $800,000 and forgiven debt up to $500,000.
"Qualified principal residence" indebtedness is defined as debt incurred in acquiring, constructing, or substantially improving a principal residence. It includes both first and second trust deeds. It also includes a refinance loan to the extent the funds were used to payoff a previous loan that would have qualified.
The tax breaks apply to debts discharged from 2009 through 2012. Californians who have already filed their 2009 tax returns may claim the exemption by filing a Form 540X amendment.
Taxpayers who do not qualify for the above exemptions (e.g., second home or rental property) may nevertheless be exempt under other provisions. Most notably, taxpayers who are bankrupt are exempt from debt relief income tax. Also, taxpayers who are insolvent are exempt from debt relief income tax to the extent their current liabilities exceed current assets.
For more information about mortgage forgiveness tax consequences, go to California Franchise Tax Board's Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Extended webpage and the Internal Revenue Service's Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act and Debt Cancellation webpage. The full text of Senate Bill 401 is available at www.leginfo.ca.gov.
Article by California Association of Realtors
Friday, August 28, 2009
First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit to be Extended?
Trade groups for real estate agents and home builders are pressuring Congress to continue and even broaden the $8,000 credit, which is scheduled to expire Nov. 30.
By Kenneth R. Harney
Reporting from Washington - It's one of the biggest unknowns bugging would-be buyers of houses and condos this summer: Will Congress let the $8,000 nonrepayable tax credit for first-time purchasers expire as scheduled 14 weeks from now?
Or will the credit get a second life and be extended for six to 12 months, taking pressure off buyers, real estate agents and escrow companies?
That's an especially urgent matter if you're a buyer just starting to shop and you see entry-level prices bottoming out or rebounding in many local markets. The tax credit statute requires buyers to fully close on their purchases -- not just be in escrow -- no later than Nov. 30. This doesn't leave a lot of leeway for people who haven't yet decided on a specific house and who haven't nailed down financing.
The process of negotiating offers, signing sales contracts, applying for a loan and completing the closing can easily extend for two months -- or a lot longer if things get off track.
Given the rapidly approaching deadline, what's the likelihood that Congress will allow at least a little extra time? Here's a quick overview: Although Congress is on its summer break, most members of the Senate and House use part of the August recess to meet with and listen to constituents in their home districts.
This year, the two biggest housing trade groups -- the National Assn. of Realtors and the National Assn. of Home Builders -- are spending the month mounting intense lobbying campaigns to make the case for extending the credit and maybe even expanding it. The effort is targeted first at the districts of members of the two tax-writing committees -- House Ways and Means and Senate Finance -- but is expected to cover most other members as well, according to officials of the two groups.
Delegations of home builders and real estate brokers already have begun descending on district offices, delivering what Jerry Howard, president and chief executive of the builders association, calls "the hard economic facts" -- the numbers of houses sold in each Congress member's district that are attributable to the tax credit; the economic ripple effects on local businesses, manufacturers and service industries; new jobs and income; plus the additional tax revenue that all this activity will help produce for local governments.
On a national basis, according to economists at the National Assn. of Realtors, the credit will be responsible for 300,000 to 350,000 additional sales of houses this year. Each home sale generates about $63,000 in downstream "ripple effects" elsewhere in the economy, they say.
If you accept the numbers, which some analysts consider a stretch, this means the housing credit provides a powerful, immediate stimulus bang for the buck. Failure to extend what may be one of the most effective pieces of the Obama administration's 2009 stimulus legislation would cost jobs, economic growth and tax revenue, the housing groups contend.
There are some signs that Congress may be getting the message. Bills are pending in both houses to extend the credit for another year. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), whose state has been among the worst hit by the housing bust, reportedly favors an extension of the credit. He was quoted to that effect by the Las Vegas Sun on Aug. 5.
Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, is cosponsoring a bill with Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) that would raise the credit amount to a maximum of $15,000. Meanwhile, the Realtors and the builders are pushing not only for extension of the credit, but for broadening it to cover all home purchases in 2010.
But can any of this happen before the Nov. 30 deadline? The key complicating factor here is Congress' heavy load of higher-profile issues that will get attention before anything else in September and October. On top of that, a tax credit extension would cost billions in lost revenue -- a big negative when the federal budget deficit is in record red-ink territory.
In the end, however, given the political economics of the housing credit, the odds favor some sort of extension, probably later rather than sooner.
kenharney@earthlink.net
Distributed by the Washington Post Writers Group.
Friday, June 12, 2009
Sacramento Weekend Happenings. June 12th-14th!
Hey Sacramento! These are just but a few of the wonderful happenings in our area! Also, don't forget! It is 2nd Saturday this weekend! Another hot spot is the Antique faire on Sunday located under the x street bridge! Have a Beautiful Weekend Sacramento! Yoli and Sharon, Your favorite Realtors! |
| |||||
|
| |||||
| ||||||
|
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
California: Fast Facts regarding Property Values
California. median home price - March 09: $253,040 (Source: C.A.R.)
Calif. highest median home price by C.A.R. region March 09: Santa Barbara So. Coast $825,000 (Source: C.A.R.)
Calif. lowest median home price by C.A.R. region March 09: High Desert $114,670 (Source: C.A.R.)
Calif. First-time Buyer Affordability Index - Fourth Quarter 08: 59 percent (Source: C.A.R.)
Mortgage rates - week ending d: 45/7/09 30-yr. fixe.84% Fees/points: 0.7% 15-yr. fixed: 4.51% Fees/points: 0.7% 1-yr. adjustable: 4.78% Fees/points: 0.6% (Source: Freddie Mac)
(facts provided by California Association of Realtors)
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
C.A.R. luanches mortgate protection plan for 1st time home buyers
C.A.R. launches mortgage protection plan for first-time home buyers
The CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) today launched the C.A.R. Housing Affordability Fund Mortgage Protection Program (C.A.R.H.A.F. MPP), for first-time home buyers.
Through the Housing Affordability Fund Mortgage Protection Program, first-time home buyers who lose their jobs due to layoffs may be eligible to receive $1,500 per month, for six months, to help make their mortgage payments. A qualified co-buyer also can participate in the program, and receive a monthly benefit of $750 per month for up to six months. Program benefits also include coverage for accidental disability and a $10,000 death benefit.
C.A.R.’s Housing Affordability Fund is dedicating $1 million toward its Mortgage Protection Program, and estimates that as many as 3,000 families will benefit from the program this year.
To qualify for the Mortgage Protection Program, applicants must:
· Be a first-time home buyer – someone who has not owned a home in three
or more years
· Open escrow April 2, 2009, or later, and close on or before Dec. 31, 2009
· Use a California REALTOR® in the transaction
· Purchase the property in California
· Be a W-2 employee (cannot be self-employed)
To apply for the program, home buyers must request an application for the H.A.F. Mortgage Protection Program from their REALTOR®.
(original post from C.A.R.)
Friday, March 6, 2009
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
California Market Flash For The Month of July
JULY MARKET FLASH
SUMMER IS A-COMIN’ IN
Intro: Spring’s enthusiasm was certainly a relief from the gray, congealed market of last winter. As spring moves into summer, we don’t know quite what to expect—far, far too many factors are in play to encourage confident prediction—but we do know this: those who are prepared will profit most from whatever direction the market does take. Read on.
Statistics:
Statewide: The median resale price of a single-family detached home in
| CurrMed | MedMOM | MedYOY | CurrSls | AcMOM | AcYOY |
| $475,000 | 0.26% | -19.18% | 1,186 | -4.35% | -27.28% |
| $387,000 | -2.03% | -34.41% | 1,206 | -4.66% | -11.71% |
| $365,000 | -3.69% | -25.05% | 191 | 24.84% | 40.44% |
| $899,000 | 12.38% | 5.76% | 200 | -7.41% | -44.29% |
| $350,000 | -6.73% | -41.67% | 232 | 9.43% | n/a |
| $474,000 | -4.24% | -24.16% | 92 | -8.00% | -17.86% |
| $360,000 | -16.28% | -21.74% | 97 | 5.43% | n/a |
| $337,870 | -2.42% | -12.44% | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| $338,000 | -3.29% | -20.47% | 489 | -1.01% | 32.88% |
| $225,000 | -3.02% | -35.53% | 2,028 | 10.16% | 116.90% |
| $332,500 | -12.90% | -43.64% | 40 | -13.04% | 17.65% |
| $517,000 | -0.19% | -21.67% | 6,216 | -1.49% | -23.07% |
| $799,500 | 4.24% | -4.25% | 484 | -20.00% | -21.43% |
| $699,500 | 4.40% | -13.64% | 444 | -22.51% | -41.81% |
| $630,000 | 0.08% | -12.50% | 1,173 | -18.54% | -46.17% |
| $543,750 | -9.98% | -24.79% | 156 | 2.63% | n/a |
| $300,000 | -6.25% | -31.66% | 440 | 2.56% | -7.56% |
| $414,000 | 0.12% | -20.31% | 409 | -7.47% | -29.24% |
| $308,750 | 2.07% | -27.35% | 212 | 34.18% | 89.29% |
Yolo County: Yolo’s loss of over $110,000 in median for the year makes it look superficially like a lot of other counties—but exciting things are happening in the shorter term; since January, sales have doubled while median has actually increased. Happily, this county will have its share in the greening of greater
Interest Rates: 30-year fixed, 6.26%; 15-year fixed, 5.78%; 30-year nonconforming, 7.32%. A spread of more than 1% between 30-year fixed and 30-year jumbo underscores the difficulty of finding loans appropriate to
During the third week in June, Freddie Mac was deeply concerned that if rates rose even slightly on conforming loans, sales would slow drastically as prospects had less incentive to look for bargains. Since then, pressure has eased as 30-year fixed has backed off about 20 basis points, but we all know that’s only a breather. Affordability in
Inventory: What you see is what you get. Availability now is unpredictable depending not only on location, but on the type of buyer (first-time, move-up, rental property, overseas) who may be interested in the specific area. Foreclosures are flooding some neighborhoods with properties, but hardly touching others. Overall, inventories still won’t be one of your major concerns, but they’re bound to figure into your calculations more than they did six months ago.
Overall Assessment: Optimism feels so good and for the first time in months, we’re feeling optimistic! Bargains abound, especially in areas away from the coast. The Bay Area’s average monthly mortgage amount has shrunk by 30% since its recent peak two years ago. Thirty year fixed mortgage rates were inching up for a while, but now seem to be retreating towards 6% rather than lunging for seven. In many parts of